July 30, 2008

Mandatory Gun Ownership?

Georgia town passed a mandatory gun ownership law... Believe me, I am all for the right of the individual to own a gun. This might be a LITTLE over the top. This community claims that their crime rate is very low. I don't doubt that at all, I would be interested in the number of accidental shootings.

http://www.reuters.com/article/newsOne/idUSN1719257620070418?sp=true

Digg this

July 29, 2008

An Action Figure We Can Believe In



Yes We Can.

(Check out the guys at Jail Break Toys if you want your own. Mine is currently keeping my Buddy Christ and shreddin' Kurt Cobain (as opposed to cardigan-wearing MTV unplugged Cobain) company on my desk at work

Digg this

July 27, 2008

I Like Ike!



Enjoy! From Sociological Images, via BoingBoing, "Dwight D. Eisenhower was the first presidential candidate to use television commercials. Below is one of his commercials, made by Disney, from 1952. Eisenhower was skeptical about using television and his opponent, Stevenson, wouldn’t appear on television because he thought it demeaning to a man ascending to the presidency. Eisenhower won."

Digg this

July 25, 2008

I LOVED this, LOVED it!

He ventured forth to bring light to the world

...And then there was a flood and all was good.

Jen, I am looking for my red state update!

Digg this

July 24, 2008

House Passes Sweeping Housing Legislation

From the NYT:

"Lawmakers and experts described the legislation as a landmark shift in the government’s role in the housing market, extending a helping hand to both Wall Street and Main Street. They said it would rank in importance with the creation of the Home Owners’ Loan Corporation to prevent foreclosures in the 1930s as part of the New Deal, and legislation in 1989 responding to the savings and loan crisis."

Remember my post about whether or not we were witnessing a repudiation of neo-liberalism? Well, are we?

Digg this

July 23, 2008

OMFG! Edwards Caught up in Baby Scandal

If this story from the Inquirer is true, then we can forget about our dreams of an Obama/Edwards '08 ticket. Crap.

Digg this

July 18, 2008

Subliminable???

The RNC/McCain campaign released an 8-minute "documentary" about Sen. Obama's supposed shifting positions on Iraq yesterday. It's a standard campaign attack, everyone is taking the candidates words and mincing them against other words they have said to show differences in positions or phrasing that can be construed in different ways. It's all part of the game.

But something else caught my eye in the FIRST five seconds of the video - which you can find on McCain's website. Watch closely in the order that the letters pop up, especially between the 2nd and 3rd second of the video. Screenshot after the jump.





I put the red circle in to show my problem. Now, I'm no conspiracy theorist, but I am having trouble believing that something like this would be left up to chance. I mean, it's like the Virgin Mary jumping out of a water stain on the wall and slapping me in the face.

"al qD" in flaming letters underneath a photo of Obama. Riiiiiiiight.

Subliminal messaging does not have to be some type of hypnosis. This is a flash that can direct one's mind to the smear/whisper campaign going on all over the country. When 12% of Americans STILL think of Obama as a secret Muslim, then using this kind of trick not only confirms it in their minds, but perpetuates the false smears.

I'd like to know if I truly am nitpicking and you think that I've thrown myself into the deep end of the Kool-Aid, or if this accidental placing of letters is a suckerpunch that even the Republicans won't admit to.

Someone tell me I'm crazy. I was really hoping for a more civilized campaign this year....

Digg this

July 17, 2008

What could be more European than a Hamburger and a Budweiser... Wait a Minute

Can I just say HA HA to us all. Through American cultural expansion that has been widely criticized for the past 60 years, and our pursuit of the highest bidder, America is no longer the land of hamburgers or Budweiser. HA HA. Yes, we still make hamburgers, and there are MANY people who will never stop drinking their Budweiser, but now neither of these iconic products are solely "American Owned and Operated". The French have reclaimed the hamburger and turned it into fine dining, while Bud sold out to a Belgian brewer (the makers of Stella Artois no less) and all reported in the last week by the New York Times. Please note, this is not a complaint. I'm actually very excited about a potentially better tasting brew. Perhaps in a few years someone might mutter: "What could be more french than a hamburger, Budweiser, and of course french fries?" HA HA

Digg this

July 16, 2008

JibJab on the Campaign

Obama riding the unicorn is the super awesomest part:

Send a JibJab Sendables® eCard Today!


I tried to get it to let me "star" in the video, but it didn't work. Maybe their servers are overwhelmed?

Digg this

July 15, 2008

McCain's Jeremiah Wright. Sort of.

So I've been wondering for quite some time now what the press would decide to throw at John McCain that is on par with Obama's Wright-gate.

It is pretty clear to anyone that reads anything of mine that I'm in the bag for Barack, and in my more partisan moments I find myself hoping for something juicy enough that the McCain camp just concedes defeat and the AZ senator heads off to join Bob Dole on the Republican also-ran lecture and Big Pharm endorsement circuit.

Now that I think I know what that blast is, though, I'm disappointed and even more over our current media establishment.

As you all probably know, McCain has recently been forgetting to acknowledge in his speeches the fact that the Czech Republic and Slovakia are now separate entities. This follows on his repeated confusion of Sunnis and Shiites and a number of other forgetfulness gaffes.

Is it important that our next president has a strong memory? Yes. Is it important that he can identify correctly the nation-states sitting at the table with the U.S. as we conduct foreign policy? Obviously. Would it be a serious problem if we selected a president suffering from mental illness or Alzheimer's or something similar? Of course.

But that isn't why the media is beating this drum, and all of us know it. They are beating it because it is about as salacious as any news about an old man (not named Kennedy) can get, even if Bob Dole's benefactor hopes to do something about it.

It is also because the media figures that peddle this kind of garbage can hide behind a barely sustainable shield of legitimacy, acting as if they are trying to point something out that, although delicate, should be considered by voters. That they are really doing their patriotic duty, rather than pushing tabloid trash.

Just like it can be argued reasonably that it is important to make sure candidates don't have terrible individuals in their inner circle, and that if they do we as voters should know about it as a way of judging their personal judgment. But that wasn't why the MSM pushed the Wright story, it was because it sold. It was despicable then and it is just as despicable now that the cannon is pointed at the other side.

I really wish there was something we could do about it, but what can be done? The proliferation of alternative sources of information has been great in many ways, but it has also forced the MSM to (further) lower its standards and trade in the salacious more than before in recent history.

Digg this

July 13, 2008

Fannie & Freddie


It certainly appears with the recent news about Fanny Mae & Freddie Mac that the U.S. housing market continues its free-fall into collapse this week.


I have to admit that I don't quite understand it all, but I found this NYT graphic quite helpful. The rest of the NYT article details how Fanny & Freddie got into this situation, which the whole thing reminds me of the fears of the Bank of the United States and the Second Bank of the United States. Jefferson, Madison, and Jackson had good reasons for opposing Hamilton and Nicholas Biddle's financial hi-jinks, not least of which was the potential for corruption--the potential of an elite group (or cabal) to form around the BUS that would use the power of the BUS to control the money supply, to employ shady loan practices, to pilfer money from the people directly, and to pilfer money from the government at the public's expense. TJ, JM, and AJ all feared that the people and the common good would suffer because the powerful BUS, out of the government's control, would dominate the nation's finances. While TJ and JM eventually caved and approved the BUS, AJ was determined to destroy it--his Bank Veto Message is among his best work, even though his war with the BUS & Biddle led to economic chaos.

Now, I'm not a huge fan of AJ in general, but it appears to me that Americans have lost the language of corruption and that we might re-consider his argument in his Veto Message. It seems like we have accepted corruption as part of a "the ways things are" or a "of course someone has to profit otherwise why would they do it" mentality of acquiesce. It's as if we put ourselves into the position of they who steal from the people and we say "hey, I would do that too if I could" and we allow corruption to continue because we secretly want to be corrupt too. TJ, JM, and AJ each had their faults, but financial corruption was not one of them.

Why hasn't there been more outrage at this? The American people have acquiesced to corruption for decades, what will it take for them to realize that it is time to fight it? We all should be ashamed for allowing the system of corruption because we are all complicit in its operations. Perhaps Americans need to re-read Henry David Thoreau's Civil Disobedience to remember that when we know something is wrong and we sit by and do nothing or we support the government that perpetrates the wrong, then we are all guilty.


Digg this

July 3, 2008

Happy Birthday America! (from Founder-Chic)


Here is the play by play:

June 7, 1776.

Richard Henry Lee moves that the Continental Congress consider three motions: first, “that these United Colonies are, and of right ought to be, free and independent states, that they are absolved from all allegiance to the British Crown, and that all political connection between them and the State of Great Britain is, and ought to be, totally dissolved"; second, that the newly independent states form “foreign Alliances”; and, third, that they create a “plan of confederation.”


The Continental Congress delays consideration so that Delegates can get instructions from their colonies.When the debate resumed on July 1 four colonies refused to approve: South Carolina, Pennsylvania, Delaware, and New York.


The hero of this tale has to be Caesar Rodney, who rode the eighty miles between Dover, Delaware and Philadelphia that night just in time to swing his colony’s vote on July 2. After that, John Dickinson and Robert Morris abstained and allowed James Wilson to cast Pennsylvania’s vote for independence; South Carolina changed its mind and now approved; and, New York abstained entirely until the next week when it also voted in favor of independence. 12 states voted for independence on July 2 and the Continental Congress called it "unanimous"--we were independent!


Thus, July 2, 1776 is America's birthday. In his excitement for the act that he had done so much to bring about JA wrote to Abby that:


"The Second Day of July 1776, will be the most memorable Epocha, in the History of America. I am apt to believe that it will be celebrated, by succeeding Generations, as the great anniversary Festival. It ought to be commemorated, as the Day of Deliverance by solemn Acts of Devotion to God Almighty. It ought to be solemnized with Pomp and Parade, with Shews, Games, Sports, Guns, Bells, Bonfires and Illuminations from one End of this Continent to the other from this Time forward forever more. You will think me transported with Enthusiasm but I am not. I am well aware of the Toil and Blood and Treasure, that it will cost Us to maintain this Declaration, and support and defend these States. Yet through all the Gloom I can see the Rays of ravishing Light and Glory. I can see that the End is more than worth all the Means. And that posterity will tryumph in that Days Transaction, even altho We should rue it, which I trust in God We shall not."

Why do we celebrate July 4 instead of July 2 as Adams believed that we would?

There are at least two answers that we can think of: first, there was a war on during the first anniversary and we simply forgot. The Records of the Continental Congress for July 2, 1777 show a deliberative body busily conducting the business of war: they empowered a Commission to find a Minister Plenipotentiary to go to Holland; they got a new surgeon general and a new member for the Board of War; they paid people for supplies; planned a discussion of the still un-ratified Articles of Confederation for the next day, etc. They were very, very busy boys on July 2, 1777. They continued their very busy schedule when they met again on July 3, they had Friday July 4 off and then met again on July 5. So they celebrated on July 4 because they had the day off--just an accident of history. In 1781 Massachusetts legislature was the first to make the celebration of Independence on July 4 official. Boston and North Carolina both made it an official holiday in 1783.


The second reason that we celebrate the Declaration of Independence rather than the day that we became independent is because of the politics of the 1790s--especially the second half of the 1790s.

Tommy didn't like A-Ham, nor did he like his politics or his view of an ideal America. A-Ham felt the same about Tommy. Founders picked sides, gloves were taken off, bitch-fighting began. Some folks--like GW--got caught in the middle; some folks--like JA--tried to stay out of it. Tommy resigned from GW's cabinet and became the mastermind of the opposition. GW resigned from office after his second term (future presidents would continue to self-impose two term limits on themselves out of respect to GW until FDR) and JA thought that he was a shoe-in for the post. After all, he had been the VP for 8 long years; he had seniority; he had negotiated the Treaty of Paris; he had been instrumental in convincing the Continental Congress to agree to independence on July 2. In short, he had his creds in order and he deserved it.


But, Tommy wanted it too. And, Tommy was pretty crafty. He had lined up his peeps behind him. Tommy did not have as many creds as JA though and so they had to make the most of the things that he did have. He had served as Minister to France after Benji came home; he had...um...run away from the British while he was Governor of Virginia (oops, best not mention that); well, he had written some things. Yeah, that's what he did, Tommy wrote a bunch of important things. He wrote the Summary View of the Rights of British Americans (for which he deserves much cred) and he wrote the Declaration of Independence--all by himself!--well, with a little help from the Drafting Committee, which included JA. So, you can see that Tommy was in a tough spot vis a vis his creds compared to JA.


Tommy's peeps began to make the Declaration into more of a big deal than it had been before--nobody thought to read the Declaration of Independence when they celebrated independence until Tommy's peeps began doing so as PR for how great Tommy was, for example.

JA got elected Prez in 1796 and Tommy got VP. By the 1800 election Tommy would tie with A-Burr for Prez, drama would ensue (eventually resulting in A-Burr shooting A-Ham in a 1804 duel). Tommy would finally win the top spot and JA would take off at 4 am so that he didn't have to watch Tommy get sworn into office. The two refused to speak for a decade, but then became friends again.


JA would always be pissed that Americans celebrate July 4 instead of July 2 believing that their doing so was evidence that they liked Tommy better than him. And, truth be told, Americans do like Tommy better than JA--even though Tommy had slaves and did some shady, shady things. JA just didn't have the personality for being adored--and, as a wise man once said "personality goes a long way."

Digg this

July 1, 2008

This Makes Me Happy/Sad

I've changed my previous title. Upon reflection, I don't think that this video proves that the world is a good place or whatever none sense I had posted yesterday. Today I think that it proves (demonstrates?) that people all over the world have a sense of humor and (maybe) that if the lame ass governments and politicians and rulers would stop screwing things up, then things could be just a little bit friendlier than they are now. Also, along with a chorus of friends and Huffpo, can I just say WTF BARAK OBAMA?? You are seriously pissing us all off now.

Feeling blue? Watch this.



Where the Hell is Matt? (2008) from Matthew Harding on Vimeo.

Digg this