April 16, 2008

Bitter Battle Blog

A lot of buzz has been raised over Barack Obama’s recent comments about small-town voters. The initial reaction was merely the public being called a name that they didn’t like. Voters like him to tell the truth, but start to get shifty when it pertains to them. Polls numbers show, however, that this offense didn’t take for long . His recent misstep shows how out of touch he is with the image of perfection that the media has built him up to be – and how he can relate to us normal-folk.

This is nothing new, especially to the blogosphere, mainstream media, or news sources.


The voters have moved on from this issue. Hillary never got the bump in the polls she was expecting, Obama is still gaining or holding ground in Pennsylvania (depending on what poll you look at), and the superdelegates aren’t moving. Without political gains on the issue, you would think that the story would be dead.

But it continues. We’ve had apologies before and we’ve had stories go on infinitely longer than they should have. This conversation is no longer about the content of the comment, however. It’s a game: how many entendres can we come up with “Bitter”? Now, don’t get me wrong – there have been some good ones. My favorite has been “Guns and Bitter”. They range from “Bitter Battle” to “Bitter-Sweet Symphony”. The most recent stories are how inconsequential these comments have been on the race at large.

I can’t help but feel that the continued frenzy over this issue is fueled by the plays on words that continue to plague articles. A new pun comes to mind, and someone on the tail end of the spin cycle contributes with an analogy of Obama trying to swallow a “bitter pill”. I’ve done my part to keep it going, too, with my own variation from the “Butter Battle Book”. Language has a powerful hold on this election. The level of political discourse in this country is higher than at any point in my lifetime, and I give much of the credit to Barack Obama’s powerful speeches that inspire a nation. It’s just a bit depressing to see this debasement of language by the infotainment (read: news) industry.

Now, I like puns as much as the next guy. Plays on words are the epitome of my sense of humor. But when language is stretched to the brink of uselessness merely for the sake of using another bad entendre, it creates a blasé attitude towards language in general – and I can’t afford to go through another era of “common” language.

It's not my fault. I guess the media has just made me bitter.


Digg this

8 comments:

Jen M. said...

I'm bitter about the debate last night. What kind of crap questions were those? Aren't people rioting over food everywhere in the world right now? (yes) But, the really important thing is to ask about whether or not Obama believes that Americans are bitter and if he will wear a flag pin? Ug. It has come to this.

Perhaps the election cycle is too long and they are all bored? I suppose that there isn't much more to learn about Obama or Clinton at this point.

Daniel N. said...

I agree. The people have decided and all that is going on now are approval rating contests. The debate last night was a two-hour Barbara Walters "How did it make you feel?" interview.

I thought that a long election season would be good for debate. And it probably would be, if I weren't spoon-fed this crap.

Daniel N. said...

Apparently, we weren't the only ones.

Jen M. said...

the second link didn't work, boo.

hey, how do you post clickable links here anyway?

Daniel N. said...

"But guess who DID enjoy the debate? (3rd paragraph down)"
Sorry - This link should work.

In the comment section, use the HTML tags around the words you want to link. Such as:

(angle bracket)a href="http://link here"(end angle bracket) WORDS YOU WANT TO LINK (angle bracket)/a(end angle bracket)

ABM said...

I agree that the debate questions were worthless, but I wonder if Obama's critique of the media will actually work in the long run? The occasional "hey, let's stop these media games and get to the substantive issues" can work. But how many times can he preface an answer with that before people, other than Bill Clinton, say that he's whining?

Jen M. said...

If ABC ran the Lincoln-Douglas debates:

Obsidian Wings

2ndAmend said...

Two things... Obama's comment has been blown out of proportion, I think, because this election cycle IS longer and people are more and more tired of the "rhetrickery." And I understand that this cycle isn't any longer, I just think that all of the coverage began earlier, was front page, first-story-on-the-evening-news earlier. Only because people are tired of Bush. Yes, Jen and Lisa, I said it. TIRED OF BUSH. Back to my point... Like Jen pointed out, there isn't much to learn. Kind of like two kids who have spent too much time together. Eventually they start to get on each other's nerves and they start to bicker, etc.

Second point. Surely Obama realizes that Midwesterners, Southerners, et.al. discovered religion way before there was ever even a thought of an economic downturn or job losses... Can someone explain to me what exactly he meant? I really want to understand, I just don't get it.

Oh. And it's only April. We still have a long way to go and the mudslingin' has only just commenced...